Some people belive that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime . Others , however , argue that the circumstances of an individual crime , and the motivation for committing it , should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment .

　　Discuss both these views and give your own opinion .

　　Answer : Band 7.5

　　Fixing punishments for each type of crime has been a debatable issue . There are many arguments supporting both views , those for and those against fixed punishments .

　　On the one hand , fixed punishments will have a deterring effect on society . Individuals knowing that they will be subject to a certain punishment if they are convicted with a given crime , will reconsider committing this act in the first place .

　　This deterring effect also leads to social stability and security , through minimising the number of crimes committed .

　　If people knew they would be able to convince the court or the jury of a reason for having committed the crime they are accused of , penal decisions would be largely arbitrary . This would result into criminals getting away with their crimes and into a high level of injustice caused by the subjective approach of different courts .

　　On the other hand , taking the circumstances of a crime and its motivation into consideration is a prerequisite for establishing and ensuring justice and equity .

　　A person killing in self-defense can not be compared to a serial killer , moving from one victim to the next . In my opinion an intermediary position between both solutions is the perfect way to establish and ensure justice and equity .

　　There has to be fixed punishment for all crimes . However , criminal laws have to provide for a minimum and maximum for the punishment and the laws also have to foresee certain cases of exemptions .

　　An example for setting minimum and maximum penalties is competition law where a person being held liable of a crime under this law will be convicted to pay a fine , according to the harm caused by the violation and the profit gained by the violator through committing the crime .

　　As for the exemptions , in some countries the law exempts thiefs stealing food during a a period of famine taking into consideration the distress and hunger .

　　Also , a person killing in self-defense will be exempted from punishment .

　　分析：虽然这篇文章存在着较少的语法错误，段落结构设计一般，但是

　　1.字数296 ，完全符合高分作文的标准 ;本篇文章没有使用模板

　　2.内容：论点鲜明，论证充分，论据合理

　　3.结构：结构清晰连贯，段落较清晰，关联性强

　　4.语言表达准确多样 ：词汇丰富，重复较少;句型多样复杂(宾语从句，定语从句，状语从句，there be 句型等);